CNN Organise Fake News London Muslim Peace Demo.

_96345362_hi039875023

Members of the Muslim community paid their respects to the victims with tributes near London Bridge. Courtesy of BBC News.

Here we can see a lovely pic of some kind hearted Muslims laying flowers and teddies and holding signs with the hashtag #Love Will Win. It was published on the BBC News website.

Knowing that the BBC often use propaganda machines such as The White Helmets to forward their agenda of multiculturalism and “diversity” (which actually just means anti-white), I decided to take a closer look at the pic.

The first thing that struck me was that they had the WRONG bridge on their signs! The bridge on their signs is Tower Bridge:

_96345362_hi03987502

Sign showing Tower Bridge.

This is London Bridge:

1200px-London_Bridge,_Lake_Havasu_City,_Arizona_(3227888290)

London Bridge.

It is a mistake commonly made by American tourists. They often think the biggest and most elaborate bridge is London Bridge and then are rather disappointing when they see that London Bridge is actually a fairly boring normal Bridge!

So It wouldn’t surprise me at all if that sign had been made by a well meaning, if not rather uninformed American.

Why do I say this?

Well, it turns out that those kind and thoughtful Muslim were not holding a spontaneous peace demo at all. The whole thing had been orchestrated by CNN – the American version of the BBC. They had set up the whole event as a photo shoot with Becky Anderson presenting it. They invited along their friends at the BBC and other Media outlets, so as to reassure you that good Muslims are up in London protesting against the terrorists.

That’s right – they faked the whole thing.

That leaves us with a few questions:

  1. Were there no other Muslims protesting the terrorists AT ALL having REAL demo’s that they could have photographed?
  2. Do they really hold us in such contempt that they think they can spoon-feed us Fake News, and we will just swallow it down?
  3. Why did they feel the need to orchestrate and report this fake demo as if it was a spontaneous event?
  4. What is their agenda?

As I have said before – Do not rely on one source of information to form your views. By all means watch CNN and the BBC, but take it with a pinch of salt and also seek other News outlets like Breitbart to gain another perspective.

No more Hashtags, No more Teddies and Flowers. Wake up for God’s sake, we are at WAR!

France_Paris_Attacks.JPEG-053cc_c0-0-4380-2553_s885x516

Don’t you dare. Don’t you dare light a little votive candle or lay flowers. Don’t you dare place a fluffy teddy holding a heart shaped balloon at this “difficult time”.

Don’t you dare change your profile pic or tweet hashtags such as #StrongerTogether #LoveWins or believe that by tweeting #PrayFor… you have fulfilled your moral duty in combating this enemy we are facing.

Your pathetic, repetitive terrorist attack rituals are only adding insult to the deaths of the innocent. Pretty soon you’ll be buying flowers and teddies wholesale – in anticipation of the next attack, and the next attack, and the next….

It begs belief that I am still seeing people online saying “This has nothing to do with Islam…”

In the video above you can see one of the scenes from last nights terror attack on London Bridge where Police were storming a nearby bar in the search for the terrorists. At the end of the video you can hear one man shout “Muslim c***s” and another reply “Don’t shout that you F***ing idiot, it has nothing to do with Muslims.”

I do not condone the language of the first man, but I admit I watched open mouthed as the second man refused to make the link between Islamic Terror and Islam – while he was lying on the floor DURING and Islamic terror attack!!!! The Terrorists were shouting “This is for Allah!” for goodness sake!!!

18814352_1371564886283701_8860265913926310274_n

For all those who still think Islamic terror has nothing to do with Islam, I would suggest educating yourself further afield than what the BBC and Labour London Muslim Mayor Sidiq Kahn tell you. Sidiq tells us that he believes terror attacks are “part and parcel of living in a big city”. Exactly who’s side are you on Sidiq? Why aren’t you protecting us? Is this Taqiyya? (Taqiyya is an Islamic juridical term whose shifting meaning relates to when a Muslim is allowed, under Sharia law, to lie.)

18922076_10211023198189269_8247359921967720491_n

As I have explained before, Islam has no centrally approved teaching. There are different schools of thought and interpretation of texts which means that you can get a Mosque at one end of your road full of perfectly reasonable nice people who are happy to live alongside you peaceably, and another Mosque at the other end of your road where everyone wants to kill you. Certainly not all Muslims are bad, but many millions do subscribe to the vile Wahhabism and Salafism, and it is time you were able to distinguish who is who and what they believe. To defeat your enemy you must know him. Start learning HERE.

Image result for ariana grande tribute manchester

Ariana Grande, queen of the Wrist Icicles, will perform her Tribute concert tonight in Manchester. I’m in no doubt she and the other “stars” who will join her on stage will be burying their uneducated heads in the sand, denying there is any link between Islam and Islamic terror. Instead they will be comforting themselves by waving teddies and shouting meaningless slogans like #StrongerTogether #LoveWins and (bizarrely) defending those who view her and the rest of us as kafir. (Kafir is a derogatory term in Islam which describes non-muslims as sub-human and hated by Allah.)

Wake Up. For God’s sake Wake Up. We are under attack. We are at War. We ain’t never gonna win a war with our heads in the sand and fluffy teddy bears sticking out of our politically correct backsides! For God’s sake WAKE UP!

*THE PROBLEM IS ISLAM* And that includes the inaction of the moderate nice Muslims. And if you disagree with me you might wanna just take a little look at this lady explaining why…

No more flowers. No more teddies. What we need now is action.

Last week it was reported in the UK press that Security sources have admitted as many as 23,000 individuals have come to their attention as possible terror suspects. It seems obvious to me that ANYONE who has links to terrorists in ANY WAY needs to be deported RIGHT NOW. If that means all 23,000 suspects then so be it.

We need to start deporting people who want to kill us on our own soil, or who have sympathy with those who want to kill us. This applies to anyone of any colour and any creed.

We need to start deporting people who preach hate in Mosques, and also those who go to listen to that hate. The Mosques need to be demolished and the people who subscribe to terrorist ideology need to be deported. It is no good sending these people to prison. The UK prisons are literally full of Islamic extremists who are on fertile ground for recruiting new members to their vile creed.

We need to start looking at who we are letting into our country through immigration, and tighten the rules at an exponential rate.

We need to start deporting racist Islamic pedophiles who have shown the most disgusting contempt for us and our children. We need to prosecute those who know about, shield, and turn a blind eye to the horrific sexual crimes committed by these men on the basis of political correctness.

We need to start deporting EVERYONE who looks on us as kafir. We saw that type of disgusting ideology in the middle of the 20th century when the Nazi’s looked upon themselves as superior, and everyone else as lesser human beings – especially the Jews who they regarded as sub-human.

Well, we beat those horrible Nazi F***ers and we will beat these horrible F***ers too!! (excuse my French).

Image result for churchill quotes

If the limp, impotent politicians are refusing to protect us than we are going to have to do it for ourselves until a new political party emerges that is not afraid to deal with this problem. Politicians are swayed by public opinion, so our greatest weapon right now is to talk.

Firstly educate yourself. Learn all you can about Radical Islam, moderate Islam and kafir, and why the powers that be in this country seem to laud Islam as being sacrosanct ie. no-one is allowed to criticize it. Why are they doing that?

Secondly, talk to your friends and family, your work colleagues and neighbors. It doesn’t have to be loud, just a quiet conversation in which you can express that you are no longer going to stand for this politically correct rubbish. You will be surprised how many will agree with you but are afraid to be the first to say it.

Get online and start joining the millions of other people who are no longer afraid to speak up against the completely biased media and their social engineering. The Media has so little power now. You can CHOOSE to bypass it and go straight to social media. Do not rely on one source of information to tell you the truth of what is going on. If you have to read the BBC and the Guardian then fine, but also read sites like Breitbart who will give an alternative view.

As a nation we will defeat this enemy. As a nation. Not by laying flowers and teddies, that will do absolutely nothing. We will defeat our enemy by naming it, knowing it, and having the courage to call it out at every opportunity. As a nation we will rediscover our identity and dignity. We are proud to be British! We will force the government to protect us – or we will elect a new government who will.

 

 

 

It is impossible to divorce someone’s character from their views…

8442771_ljpoj_383909c

 

The compassionate merciful response to Kieran Conry’s apology and resignation has been acknowledged and received. The man must now get on with the rest of his life. But mercy does not mean brushing it under the carpet.  As a catholic community it is important to learn from any mistakes made.

I have been researching Kieran Conry on Google and have stumbled upon a huge amount of information. Here are the facts:

His ministry:

  • He was ordained in 1975
  • In 1980 he became the private secretary to the Apostolic Delegate (Pro-Nuncio from 1982), Archbishop Bruno Heim, and then his successor Archbishop Luigi Barbarito.
  • He was appointed Monsignor in 1984.
  • From 1988 to 1993, Conry was a member of the National Conference of Priests, and its Vice-Chairman from 1992 to 1993.
  • From 1993 to 2000, he was involved with training counsellors for Catholic Marriage Care.
  • From the beginning of 1994 to 2001, Conry was Director of the Catholic Media Office in London, the press office of the Bishop’s Conference of England & Wales, and also Editor of Briefing, the Bishop’s official journal.
  • On 8 May 2001, Conry was named the fourth Bishop of Arundel and Brighton by Pope John Paul II. He received his episcopal consecration on the following 9 June at Arundel Cathedral.
  • He was Chair of the Bishops’ Conference Department of Evangelisation and Catechesis.
  • He was the Church’s Bishop for Youth.
  • He sat on the Mixed Commission of the Conference of Religious.

His views:

  • He is described as being an ‘uber liberal’.
  • Bishop Conry has been critical of going to confession regularly, saying that, in his experience, people would always come back saying the same things week after week, suggesting that no interior conversion or repentance was actually taking place.
  • He supports same-sex civil partnerships for the legal benefits it gives to those involved.
  • He was not a fan of the Latin Mass.
  • He was in favour of contraception.
  • He disagreed that secularization was the real reason for the Church’s decline in the west.

Let’s not underestimate how high up this man was. He was Chair of  Evangelisation and Catechesis for goodness sake! It explains a lot about the church in the UK doesn’t it?! It is impossible to divorce someone’s character from their views. Perhaps now in the light of recent revelations it is easier to understand what kind of character he truly had, and how that was motivating his views and decisions for the Church.

But there are also deeper issues here.  For instance – did the other UK Bishops know about Conry’s affairs (going back to 2001)? And if so, why was he ever put in the position of Bishop in the first place? These are really serious questions. If the hierarchy knew – which seems very possible – then that surely presents us with a much greater scandal yes?

This article i found written January 2002 seems to highlight these fears:

CRONIES, CROOKS AND CRISIS POPES

It seems that Kieran Conry was earmarked for higher things by Cardinal Hume during his time as Director of the Catholic Media Office. Despite one priest’s assessment of his time there as being “by any objective standards a disaster,” Conry became one of the sponsored ‘untouchables’ – and acted accordingly. “For a period I saw quite a bit of Conry,” a deacon confided. “He seemed to live in a secular, corporate world rather than a priestly one. I never once saw him dressed as a priest. His point of view was unfailingly liberal.”

In other words, he was left to do his own thing. And if that is considered par for the priestly course nowadays, I guess one could say the same about his ‘special friendship.’ “Kieran was often seen out and about with his female friend,” a London priest informed me. “Everyone knew about it in the same way that everyone, including the bishops, knew about the homosexual relationship between Martin Pendergast [ex-Carmelite priest] and Julian Filochowski [Director of CAFOD, the bishops’ overseas aid agency].”

At that time, in commenting on the routine breaking of vows of chastity acknowledged by the hierarchy in a message to the Pope, Mgr (now Bishop) Arthur Roche had assured The Times that “… the bishops of England and Wales are realists.” Just how “realistic” they are I indicated by relating, among other cases, the example of the London priest well known to be living with his Pastoral Assistant, who he took along to Deanery meetings at the Bishop’s house! In that context, Mgr Conry ‘merely’ keeping regular company in such public fashion is hardly surprising. Yet even if such increasingly common ‘relationships’ are purely platonic, the point is that scandal is given, above all to those of simple and delicate conscience who are offended by it and interpret it in a bad sense. St. Joseph Cafasso, a nineteenth century version of the Cure of Ars, called this kind of scandal “the scandal of the little ones.” A priest’s life is not his own, and so the Saint exhorts him to absolutely abstain from any behaviour which might give scandal, even if caused by appearance only and the result of the ignorance of others.

One assumes that this is the case with Mgr Conry. But regardless, does it not leave the gravest questions about ecclesiastical propriety? Not to say about his prudential judgement and ability to offer wise moral leadership and counsel to others? Especially when shortly before his episcopal consecration Mass he is seen in Italy strolling hand in hand and enjoying leisurely outings with his lady friend at Palazzola, the residence on Lake Albano belonging to the English College. Again, it was the appearance of scandal that upset those who viewed the liaison, including one priest who was sufficiently disgusted to make representations to a Vatican Congregation. Word quickly spread and it is said that Church authorities may have queried Mgr Conry about the matter. Whatever the case, it is a measure of the unqualified protection afforded to Modernist cronies that not only did Mgr Conry’s less than discreet romantic entanglement not disqualify him from consideration for a bishopric in the first place, but that the Palazzola coup de grace did not even delay his elevation by a single day.

It is especially shocking in light of the numerous sexual scandals in recent years which have caused such harm to the Church in general and episcopate in particular, and which, one might have thought, would have seen Rome acting swiftly to snuff out the slightest possibility of further tabloid headlines. Not on your life. Ensconced in a plum see, Bishop Conry is now fulfilling the standard expectations of his liberal patrons: Protestantising and bureaucratizing his diocese behind a welter of Modernist buzz-words about “community,” “renewal” and “change.” – (Article written Janurary 2002)

Who knew about Conry’s affairs? Who turned a blind eye? Who allowed him to carry on in his position when he never should been there? How did he get selected for the position of Bishop in the first place? What is the agenda in the UK hierarchy?

One cannot help feeling that he was selected not for his personal holiness, strong moral character or his ability to uphold doctrine, but instead for his progressive, liberal views. Views that were formed in the mind of a man with a lot on his conscience.

What a mistake-a to make-a.

 

 

Spources: http://www.christianorder.com/features/features_2002/features_jan02.html